Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937

Peck v. Saltzman

Peck v. Saltzman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 6, 1937
163 Misc. 50; 296 N.Y.S. 299; 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1280

Counsel

Henry L. Ughetta [Everett W. Bovard of counsel], for the appellant., Spencer & Zabelle [Michael Spencer of counsel], for the respondent.

Peck v. Saltzman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

A statement alleged to have been made to a police officer on the street shortly after an accident is not a statement in an “ inquiry ” as that term is used in section 343-a of the Civil Practice Act. The trial court was justified, therefore, in refusing to receive the police officer’s testimony in behalf of defendant as to what defendant’s chauffeur had said to him shortly after the accident, for the purpose of impeaching the chauffeur who, when called by defendant, had denied making the statements sought to be established.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur. Present — Levy, Hammer and Callahan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.