Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937

Weinstein v. R. H. Macy & Co.

Weinstein v. R. H. Macy & Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 13, 1937
163 Misc. 61; 296 N.Y.S. 341; 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1286

Counsel

Andrews, Baird & Shumate [Samuel E. Swiggett of counsel], for the appellant., Samuel 0. SchencJs, for the respondents.

Weinstein v. R. H. Macy & Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, a customer in defendant’s department store, was injured while ascending an ordinary stairway when she was pushed by other customers constituting part of a large crowd. We find no evidence of defendant’s negligence in this case. There was no proof of notice that the stairway in question was continually *62crowded or any other proof to show the necessity for guards at the point in question. The case of Newberg v. Macy & Co., Inc. (App. Term, 1st Dept., Jan. 1930, N. Y. L. J. Feb. 19, 1930, p. 2540; affd., 228 App. Div. 804) is distinguishable in that there was proof of continual crowding at the point of the accident which was the entrance to a mechanical escalator. At an ordinary stairway, at least in the absence of proof of the continual presence of crowds creating a dangerous condition there, it is not negligence for a storekeeper to fail to have guards to regulate customers.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — Levy, Hammer and Callahan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.