Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937

Baron Corp. v. Piedmont Fire Insurance

Baron Corp. v. Piedmont Fire Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 16, 1937
166 Misc. 69; 1 N.Y.S.2d 713; 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1139

Counsel

John L. Fletcher, for the appellants., Horowitz & Hurwitz, for the respondent.

Baron Corp. v. Piedmont Fire Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff had the burden of showing its alleged fire damage. The only evidence of the cause of the alleged fire, charring or burning of electric wiring, was that of an overload of electrical current.

The burning or charring of a wire carrying electric current occurring during or accompanying an overload of current must be regarded as an electrical injury, especially when, as here, there is an absence of evidence showing such burning or charring to be fire as distinguished, if that can be, from electrical injury.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for defendants, with costs.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Hammer, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.