Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938

Bazer v. Himmel

Bazer v. Himmel
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 4, 1938 · Hammer
166 Misc. 563; 2 N.Y.S.2d 855; 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1358

Counsel

Aaron Edward Norwack, for the judgment creditor., Philip Gelfand, for the judgment debtor.

Bazer v. Himmel

Concurring Opinion

Hammer, J.

I concur in the result only as in my opinion in an appropriate case upon proper proof the court may stay either the issuance of the execution or the arrest thereunder.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

By the terms of his judgment the judgment creditor was entitled to the issuance of a body execution against the debtor.

Section 775 of the Judiciary Law, relied upon by the debtor, does not authorize a stay of body execution; it provides for cases wherein an offender may be released from imprisonment.

Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion to relieve debtor of failure to pay judgment and staying the issuance of body execution denied; and matter remitted to the justice below for appropriate action on creditor’s application in accordance with this opinion.

Lydon and Frankenthaler, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., concurs in result with memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.