Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Folgner
Alexander Hamilton Institute v. Folgner
168 Misc. 358; 6 N.Y.S.2d 65; 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1793
Opinion of the Court
The defense attempts to show by parol that the written contract sued upon was to be ineffectual, if the defendant decided to discontinue the course of studies. This proof would be inadmissible (Jamestown Business College Assn. v. Allen, 172 N. Y. 291), and hence no triable issue remained.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Frankenthaler and Noonan, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.