Friedman v. North Side Savings Bank
Friedman v. North Side Savings Bank
170 Misc. 7; 9 N.Y.S.2d 470; 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2304
Opinion of the Court
Interpleader, under the Banking Law, is not limited to any particular court, but may be obtained in the court where the action is pending. (Banking Law, § 239, subd. 6, IT M; Gottschall v. German Savings Bank, 45 Misc. 27.)
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.
Lydon and Shientag, JJ., concur.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting). I dissent. Agreeing with the rule of law stated, I am for affirmance, as the court below seemed to exercise a wise discretion in refusing interpleader as the issues should be tried and determined in the conversion action pending in the Supreme Court, in which the funds have been attached by the sheriff.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.