Lapidus v. Capital Neon Sign Corp.
Lapidus v. Capital Neon Sign Corp.
170 Misc. 489; 10 N.Y.S.2d 441; 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1585
Opinion of the Court
The mere naming of a person as managing agent of a corporation, where the answering affidavit denies control over the person sought to be examined, is insufficient for the granting of an order to examine the named person as such agent.
Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to renewal of application for examination of appellant.
All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.