Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939

Lapidus v. Capital Neon Sign Corp.

Lapidus v. Capital Neon Sign Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 10, 1939
170 Misc. 489; 10 N.Y.S.2d 441; 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1585

Counsel

Kamer & Kamer [Frank Kamer of counsel], for the appellant., Emma Haber, for the respondent.

Lapidus v. Capital Neon Sign Corp.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The mere naming of a person as managing agent of a corporation, where the answering affidavit denies control over the person sought to be examined, is insufficient for the granting of an order to examine the named person as such agent.

Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to renewal of application for examination of appellant.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.