Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 21, 1939
171 Misc. 2; 11 N.Y.S.2d 716; 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1788

Counsel

Leo D. Politzer [Morris Pottish of counsel], for the appellant., E. C. Sherwood [Richard J. Relyea of counsel], for the respondent.

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

As the order appealed from is a mere ruling of the trial court it is not appealable. (Kramer v. United States F. & G. Co., 212 App. Div. 644.) Subdivision 7 of section 154 of the Municipal Court Code, providing for appeal by permission from any other order than those specifically appealable under said section, does not warrant an appeal by permission from a mere ruling on the trial.

Appeal dismissed and cause remitted to the court below for trial.

All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and Franken-THALER, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.