Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 21, 1939
171 Misc. 2; 11 N.Y.S.2d 716; 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1788

Counsel

Leo D. Politzer [Morris Pottish of counsel], for the appellant., E. C. Sherwood [Richard J. Relyea of counsel], for the respondent.

Pirkner v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

As the order appealed from is a mere ruling of the trial court it is not appealable. (Kramer v. United States F. & G. Co., 212 App. Div. 644.) Subdivision 7 of section 154 of the Municipal Court Code, providing for appeal by permission from “ any other order ” than those specifically appealable under said section, does not warrant an appeal by permission from a mere ruling on the trial.

Appeal dismissed and cause remitted to the court below for trial.

All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and Franken-THALER, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.