Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939

Hausman v. Steiner

Hausman v. Steiner
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 27, 1939
171 Misc. 676; 13 N.Y.S.2d 567

Counsel

Herdling & Scharf fJulius Brandes of counsel], for the appellant., Philip Fliashnick [Julian Liberman of counsel], for the respondent.

Hausman v. Steiner

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order directing the issuance of a garnishee execution in favor of plaintiff, judgment creditor, was unauthorized in view of the fact that execution had not been returned unsatisfied at the time of the making of said order, as required by subdivision ] of section 684 of the Civil Practice Act. The movant, as a junior garnishee lienor, has an interest which entitles him to apply for a vacatur of the order permitting the issuance of a garnishee execution in favor of the respondent. (See Matter of Royal Bank, 140 App. Div. 480.) The garnishee execution was properly issued to the city marshal.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur. Present — Frankenthaler, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.