Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943

Wolf v. Farkas

Wolf v. Farkas
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 8, 1943
179 Misc. 702; 39 N.Y.S.2d 359; 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1531

Counsel

Sol S. Zuckerman for appellant., Israel Siegel for respondent.

Wolf v. Farkas

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order is not appealable. (Civ. Prac. Act, ยง 583; Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co., 77 App. Div. 407; Jackman v. Hasbrouck, 168 App. Div. 256; Fine v. Cummins, 260 App. Div. 569.) The correctness of a ruling granting or denying a nonsuit during trial may only be remedied by appeal from the judgment or upon a motion for a new trial.

It may be remarked that there is nothing in this record indicating that the trial court intended in granting a nonsuit as to the second cause of action that the dismissal was without prejudice. Where a trial judge in ruling upon a motion to dismiss intends to dismiss without prejudice, and through a defect in the record that fact is not shown, it seems but just that a *703motion may be made to correct the inadvertence so as to conform the record to the decision as intended by a statement in the record by the trial judge to that, effect. (Cabang v. United States Shipping Bd. Merchant Fleet Corp., 227 App. Div. 751.) Appeal dismissed.

All concur. Present โ€” Hammer, Miller and McLaughlin, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.