Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943

Mandula v. Korrol Manufacturing Co.

Mandula v. Korrol Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 25, 1943
180 Misc. 378; 42 N.Y.S.2d 555

Counsel

Nathan Cooper for appellant., Emmet L. Holbrook for respondent.

Mandula v. Korrol Manufacturing Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment is -against the overwhelming weight of the credible evidence, oral as well as documentary. The defendant, therefore, is not only entitled to a reversal of the judgment but also to restitution of the sum of $293.23 which represents the judgment obtained by plaintiff in this action.

*379Judgment, so far as appealed from, reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of the defendant for $293.23, with costs.

Shientag, Rosbnman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.

See Civil Practice Act, § 587. — [Rep.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.