Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943

Strauss v. United States Lines Co.

Strauss v. United States Lines Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 25, 1943
180 Misc. 664; 42 N.Y.S.2d 618

Counsel

John F. X. McKiernan for appellant., Alfred Feingold for respondent.

Strauss v. United States Lines Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s obligation was to refund reichsmarks and entitled plaintiff to a judgment in dollars measured by the rate of exchange prevailing at the place and date of demand of refund. (Hoppe v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, 235 N. Y. 37, 39.) Forty cents per reichsmark represents the official rate of exchange adopted in transactions controlled by the German Government at the time reichsmarks were paid to defendant and is not representative of the value of reichsmarks in foreign exchange.

Judgment reversed, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, the amount to be assessed accordingly in the court below.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.