Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945

Galtrof v. Aktiengesellschaft

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 21, 1945

186 Misc. 107; 59 N.Y.S.2d 724; 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2635

Counsel

Herbert 8. Ogden for appellant., H. David Fraclcman and Michael E. Rosenstein for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

It was error to deny the defendant’s motion for a stay. (See Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca, &c., 248 U. S. 9.) In the circumstances summary judgment should not have been granted.

The order denying motion for stay should be reversed, and motion granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. The judgment and order granting summary judgment should be vacated. The order of April 30, 1942, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed.

Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.