Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945

Siegel v. Goodman

Siegel v. Goodman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 21, 1945
186 Misc. 108; 59 N.Y.S.2d 725; 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2636

Counsel

Lawrence 1. Gerber for appellants., Bennett I. Schlessel for respondent.

Siegel v. Goodman

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The complaint should have been dismissed at the end of plaintiff’s case. Under section 33-c of the Personal Property Law, there could be no modification of the written agreement unless in writing.

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.