Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946

Spiegel v. Cohen

Spiegel v. Cohen
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 4, 1946
186 Misc. 889; 62 N.Y.S.2d 70; 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2186

Counsel

Alfred E. Santangelo for appellants., Louis J. Schwarts for respondent.

Spiegel v. Cohen

Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to establish his first canse of action. He was not licensed as an electrician in New York City nor did he prove that he was employed by and worked under the supervision of a licensed person, partnership or corporation (Administrative Code of City of New York, § B30-17.0). Plaintiff’s proof as to the second cause of action was insufficient and failed to establish usury.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.