Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946

Reiss v. Mackay

Reiss v. Mackay
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 4, 1946
187 Misc. 360; 61 N.Y.S.2d 851; 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2162

Counsel

Morris Wagman for appellants., Emanuel M. Parker and Sidney S. Goldstein for respondents.

Reiss v. Mackay

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The proof of the landlords’ ownership of the premises is sufficient. The “ immediate and personal use ” required by subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Commercial Bent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd. by L. 1946, ch. 272) refers to use immediately upon removal of the tenant, not to use immediately upon acquiring title. The final order cannot be sustained upon the ground that the landlords failed to show good faith; from the record it appears that the court below did not pass upon that question.

The final order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellants to abide the event.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.