Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946

Schimmel v. Barberer

Schimmel v. Barberer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 29, 1946
187 Misc. 525; 67 N.Y.S.2d 425; 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3258

Counsel

Irwin Isaacs for appellant., William Gibbs for respondent.

Schimmel v. Barberer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The landlord’s recovery of rent is restricted by section 260 of the Multiple Dwelling Law, which became effective April 19,1945. (L. 1945, ch. 880.) Under that statute, the landlord has the burden of proving that the rent demanded did not exceed the lowest rent charged for any month between September 30,1937, and March 3,1938. No such proof was offered.

The final order and judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, without costs of this appeal to either party, the new trial to be limited to the determination of the amount of rent due.

MacCrate, MoCooet and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.

Order and judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.