Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946

Jerome v. Yudt

Jerome v. Yudt
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 24, 1946
187 Misc. 1071; 66 N.Y.S.2d 76; 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2991

Counsel

Sol S. Ostertag for appellant-respondent., Joseph S. Rodell for respondents-appellants.

Jerome v. Yudt

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The Stabilization Extension Act' of 1944, which modified subdivision (e) of section 205 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 925, subd. [e]), prevents the collection of cumulative damages. The maximum that the plaintiff can recover for a series of overcharges is three times the amount of the overcharges or $50, whichever sum is the greater.

The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery thereof to the sum of $156, with interest and costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

McLaughlin, Eder and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.