Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946

Schneider v. New York Ellbee Furriers Corp.

Schneider v. New York Ellbee Furriers Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 19, 1946
188 Misc. 89; 67 N.Y.S.2d 269; 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3226

Counsel

Harry M. Krokow for appellants., Nathaniel Saperstein and L. Stewart Gatter for respondent.

Schneider v. New York Ellbee Furriers Corp.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Evidence is lacking of the damage suffered by plaintiff. The measure of damage is the difference between the *90value of the article if the work was done properly and the actual value of the article in the condition in which it was returned' (Chaityn v. Stock, 120 N. Y. S. 89).

The judgment should be reversed, judgment directed for plaintiff and case remitted to the court below for the assessment of damages. The order should be affirmed.

McLaughlin, Eder and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.