Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947

Schechter v. Weiss

Schechter v. Weiss
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 23, 1947
188 Misc. 487; 68 N.Y.S.2d 507; 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2085

Counsel

Harry Rappaport for appellant., Samuel Brill and Harry SchecMer, in person, for respondent.

Schechter v. Weiss

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There is no express covenant in the lease under which plaintiff went into possession, which requires defendant to make repairs. As a statutory tenant, plaintiff’s rights and obligations are those fixed by the lease. A diminution of service might justify an application to the Office of Price Administration, for a reduction in rent but would not support an action, ex contractu, for repairs made by plaintiff.

*488The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Hammer, Shiehtag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.