Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948

Conoscente v. Manfredi

Conoscente v. Manfredi
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 14, 1948
191 Misc. 929; 82 N.Y.S.2d 771; 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3217

Counsel

Joseph C. Bottitta for appellant., Abraham L. Siegel for respondent.

Conoscente v. Manfredi

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment should he affirmed, with $25 costs to respondent.

The appeals from the orders are dismissed. No order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict is contained in the record. An order denying a motion to reargue is not appeal-able. (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code [L. 1915, ch. 279], § 154; Lehman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 30 N. Y. S. 2d 716; Hygrade-Magnet Corp. v. Supino, 23 N. Y. S. 2d 55; Millstein v. Schwarts, 23 N. Y. S. 2d 357.)

MacCbate, Steinbrixii and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.