Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948

Penner v. Geller

Penner v. Geller
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 23, 1948
193 Misc. 821; 87 N.Y.S.2d 249; 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3933

Counsel

Irving Klein for appellant., Maurice Millimet for respondent.

Penner v. Geller

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The maximum rent heretofore established for the dwelling space involved herein continues in effect until changed by the Housing Expediter (Controlled Housing Rent Regulation, ยง 4, as amd.). Where there is a decrease in the minimum services to which the tenant is entitled, his remedy is by appropriate application to the expediter under paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) and paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of section 5 of the โ€˜ rent regulation for a corresponding reduction of the maximum rent. There can be no recovery for penalties or damages in the absence of a refund order. (Cf. Woods v. Stone, 333 U. S. 472.)

*823The final order and judgment should be reversed on the law, with $30 costs to landlord, final order directed for landlord and counterclaim dismissed without prejudice, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Steinbrink and Golden, JJ., concur. MacCrate, J., taking no part.

Final order and judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.