Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949

Pollack v. Springer

Pollack v. Springer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 22, 1949
196 Misc. 1015; 95 N.Y.S.2d 527; 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3179

Counsel

George 8. Fishman for appellants., Abraham A. Katz and Louis Tancil for respondent.

Pollack v. Springer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The prior judgments secured by defendants against plaintiff should have been allowed as an offset to the sum due to plaintiff.

The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $993.94, together with taxable costs, and as modified, affirmed, without costs.

Hammer, Hofstadter and Pécora, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.