Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950

Reizen v. Pardes

Reizen v. Pardes
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 23, 1950
197 Misc. 384; 98 N.Y.S.2d 276

Counsel

James Bruce and A. Hayne de Tampert for appellant., Leon E. Borden and Hyman Stein for respondent.

Reizen v. Pardes

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The second third-party defendant having raised issues by its denial of the allegations of the main complaint, is, within the purview of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act to be deemed a party subject to examination before trial by plaintiff.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Steinbrink, Rubenstein and Golden, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.