Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951

Mandel v. Brodsky

Mandel v. Brodsky
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 29, 1951
200 Misc. 344; 106 N.Y.S.2d 907; 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2253

Counsel

Aaron I. Schwartz for appellant., Pincus Cashman for respondent.

Mandel v. Brodsky

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There can be no question but that section 164 of the Civil Practice Act as amended in 1934 (L. 1934, ch. 504), governed the service of the summons in this proceeding in 1936. The case of Schulte Real Estate Co. v. Pirkig (191 Misc. 926), therefore, does not apply.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and judgment reinstated.

Hammer and Eder, JJ., concur; Hoestadter, J., concurs in result.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.