Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953

Seidenberg v. Cavanagh

Seidenberg v. Cavanagh
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 12, 1953
204 Misc. 235; 125 N.Y.S.2d 682; 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2354

Counsel

Benjamin J. Tarushin for appellant., Salvatore J. lannucci for respondents.

Seidenberg v. Cavanagh

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The trial court’s attempted fixation of rent was not based on any legal maximum established pursuant to the Federal or State rent control law. The power to adjust residential rent is vested exclusively in the State rent commission. (Ivanovsky v. Paladino, N. Y. L. J., March 31, 1952, p. 1273, col. 6; Friedman v. Carr, N. Y. L. J., May 16, 1952, p. 1979, col. 1.) "Disposition of this proceeding, including tenant’s counterclaim, must await a determination of the maximum rent by the State rent commission.

*236The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, and new trial directed after the maximum rent is determined by the Temporary State Housing Kent Commission, with $30 costs to tenant to abide the event.

Walsh, Cupp and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.