Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953

Citera v. Salzano

Citera v. Salzano
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 26, 1953
204 Misc. 287; 122 N.Y.S.2d 272; 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1843

Counsel

Abraham E. Glide for appellants., William Alden Wingate for respondents.

Citera v. Salzano

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs, admittedly nonresidents of the borough of Manhattan, improperly brought this action in that borough and defendants were entitled to have it transferred to the borough of Queens, where both defendants resided and maintained their place of business. The fact that it was removed to a district in Queens in which defendants did not reside or have their place of business did not warrant the retransfer to The Bronx. Section 17 of the New York City Municipal Court Code provides that the basis for the proper place of venue is the borough, and not the district, in which a party resides.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion for reargument denied, and cause transferred to the Municipal Court, Fourth District, Queens.

Hofstadter, Schreiber and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.