Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956

Magee v. Rifkind

Magee v. Rifkind
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 14, 1956
13 Misc. 2d 563; 153 N.Y.S.2d 731

Counsel

Morris Schwalb for appellants., Murray M. Zoberg and Merrill Charlton for respondents.

Magee v. Rifkind

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The court did not specify the grounds on which the motion for a new trial was made and the grounds on which it was decided in the order vacating the judgment after trial and ordering a new trial; no opinion or memorandum was rendered in connection with the motion and such grounds are not indicated in any way. The order, therefore, fails to comply with the requirements of rule 224 of the Rules of Civil Practice (Morris v. Phillips, 48 N. Y. S. 2d 423).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and judgment reinstated.

Concur — Hofstadter, Heoht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.