Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957

Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc.

Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 14, 1957 · Aurelio, Heoht, Tilzer
8 Misc. 2d 589; 169 N.Y.S.2d 942; 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3502

Counsel

Marc Hermelin and Irving L. Rollins for appellant., Hyman Abrams for respondent.

Kimma v. Leonard Chazen, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The purpose of an oral indorsement is merely to apprise the defendant of the nature of the cause of action which function was served here by the indorsement.

The summary statement of the cause of action indorsed on the summons was legally sufficient pursuant to section 78 of the Municipal Court Code.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

Heoht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.