Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957

Lutensqui v. Sussman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 7, 1957 · Aurelio, Hecht, Tilzer

8 Misc. 2d 902; 160 N.Y.S.2d 895; 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3538

Counsel

E. Edan Spencer and Robert D. Foglia for appellant., Seymour J. Goldman and Abraham J. Yasgour for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The testimony of plaintiff and that of her lay witness, unsupported by expert testimony, is not sufficient to overcome the expert testimony of defendant that the dentures have been adjusted and the teeth are in proper occlusion (Young v. Wybrant, 61 N. Y. S. 2d 473).

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, without costs.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.