Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957

Boros v. Mayo

Boros v. Mayo
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 31, 1957 · Aurelio, Hecht, Tilzer
8 Misc. 2d 949; 160 N.Y.S.2d 916; 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3581

Counsel

Benjamin Adler for appellants-respondents., Joseph R. D’Arrigo' for respondent-appellant.

Boros v. Mayo

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The imposition of the condition for the opening of the default which deprived defendants of a trial by jury was an abuse of discretion (Gluech v. Tull, 192 App. Div. 81; Zeesell Realty v. Cunningham, 125 Misc. 444). The defendants in these circumstances did not absolutely waive the right to an examination before trial.

The order should be modified by striking therefrom the provision imposing conditions, and as modified affirmed, without costs. The cross appeal of the plaintiff should be dismissed.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Order modified, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.