Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958

Rothman v. Skernick

Rothman v. Skernick
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 7, 1958
15 Misc. 2d 962; 187 N.Y.S.2d 255; 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4086

Counsel

William S. O’Connor and George V. O’Haire for appellant., Noah Seedman for respondent.

Rothman v. Skernick

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to present any reason or excuse for her delay of more than two years after joinder of issue in bringing the cause on for trial. Under the circumstances here disclosed, it was an improper exercise of discretion to deny appellant’s motion to dismiss the action as against him for lack of prosecution. (Rothman v. Skernick & Morton Bros., N. Y. L. J., Oct. 28, 1957, p. 9, col. 3 and cases cited.)

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with

$10 costs and taxable disbursements, and motion granted.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.