Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959

Green v. Bramson

Green v. Bramson
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 5, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 150; 183 N.Y.S.2d 918; 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4365

Counsel

Irvi/ng Jaffe, Normand Bard and Louis Mitler, for appellants., Guadagno $ Shugerman (Arthur N. Seif and Eric A. Seif of counsel), for respondents.

Green v. Bramson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The only evidence relating to the jury’s misconduct was adduced at a hearing held approximately two weeks after the verdict was returned and was given by the jurors themselves.

*151While the conduct of the offending juror cannot be justified it does not appear that the item which he brought to the jury room contributed to a prejudicial attitude on the part of the jurors.

Moreover a juror may not impeach his own verdict and under all the circumstances here the hearing conducted by the court below was violative of that well-established principle.

The order setting aside the verdict of the jury may not be permitted to stand and is hereby reversed.

The order should be reversed, with costs, and the verdict of the jury is reinstated.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.