Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959

Brignole v. Maruccia

Brignole v. Maruccia
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 16, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 876; 186 N.Y.S.2d 742; 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3903

Counsel

David Friedman for appellant., Sidney Kraft for respondent.

Brignole v. Maruccia

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Defendant Laura Maruccia did not deny the receipt of the foodstuffs sold to her on credit. Nor did she deny payment to her by her husband of $75 per week and other substantial amounts for rent and incidental living expenses during the entire period when plaintiff extended credit. Consequently she has no defense to plaintiff’s claim and the motion for summary judgment as against her should have been granted.

*877The order should be modified by granting the motion as against defendant Laura Maruccia, with $10 costs to appellant against defendant Laura Maruccia, and as modified affirmed, with $10 costs to defendant Alfred J. Maruccia.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Hecht, JJ.

Order modified, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.