Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959

Studman v. Brandman

Studman v. Brandman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 26, 1959 · Brown, Hart, Pette
18 Misc. 2d 242; 192 N.Y.S.2d 677; 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3606

Counsel

Madder Bros. (Seymour G. Madder of counsel), for appellant., Charles Metz for respondent.

Studman v. Brandman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and judgment entered thereon should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to defendant and motion denied. The affidavits submitted present triable issues of fact as to whether or not the notes in question were executed and delivered upon the condition alleged by the defendant. (Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Corp., 3 N Y 2d 395 and cases cited therein.)

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.