Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959

Diodato v. Rosetti

Diodato v. Rosetti
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 2, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 780; 195 N.Y.S.2d 865; 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2929

Counsel

Charles H. Tenney, Corf oration Counsel (Robert L. Ellis of counsel), for appellant., Leon Washor for respondent.

Diodato v. Rosetti

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decision of the trial court was against the weight of the credible evidence. Moreover, it was error to exclude evidence of the convictions of plaintiff and his principal witness for the crime of book-making.

The judgment should be reversed on the law and facts and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to defendant to abide the event.

Pette and Hart, JJ., concur; Brown, J., dissents and votes to dismiss the complaint on the merits.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.