Thomas v. Holy Trinity
Thomas v. Holy Trinity
19 Misc. 2d 960; 196 N.Y.S.2d 318; 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3508
Opinion of the Court
While the opening of the default cannot in the circumstances be treated as an abuse of discretion, the court should have directed that the judgment stand as security.
The order should be modified to direct that the judgment entered stand as security, and as modified affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant.
Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hoestadter and Aurelio, JJ.
Order modified, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.