Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960

Dickinson v. Pierce

Dickinson v. Pierce
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 29, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 941; 206 N.Y.S.2d 348; 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3700

Counsel

De Lukey & Shapiro (Stanley Shapiro of counsel), for appellant. Donald J. Turrell and Harold L. Weiss for respondent.

Dickinson v. Pierce

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The conflicting assertions in the affidavits submitted by the parties on the motion on the question of service should not have been resolved without a hearing. (Krantz v. Salvio, 283 App. Div. 965; Raynor v. Steinfield, 261 App. Div. 929; Gaines v. Bryant Park Bldg., 28 N. Y. S. 2d 215, motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied 263 App. Div. 876.)

The orders should be unanimously reversed and matter remitted to the Municipal Court for disposition after determining on oral proof whether tenant was served with process.

Concur — Hart, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Orders reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.