Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960

Amos Parrish & Co. v. Kriegel

Amos Parrish & Co. v. Kriegel
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 7, 1960
28 Misc. 2d 501; 219 N.Y.S.2d 443; 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2720

Counsel

Norman J. Lowey for appellant. Arthur L. Gould for respondent.

Amos Parrish & Co. v. Kriegel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The notation on the check that it is an advance against commissions to be earned does not necessarily make the advance a loan, despite the added words to be adjusted every month”. Nor was the asserted agreement for a flat salary during the training period inconsistent with the commission arrangement. Hence there were triable issues both on the plaintiff’s cause of action and the counterclaim.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Concur—Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.