Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960

Heller v. Tri-Boro Enterprises, Inc.

Heller v. Tri-Boro Enterprises, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 8, 1960
28 Misc. 2d 585; 219 N.Y.S.2d 918; 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2065

Counsel

Salamon & Noble (Milton Noble of counsel), for appellant. Handelsman, Arutt S Knox (Maxwell Handelsman of counsel), for respondent.

Heller v. Tri-Boro Enterprises, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The cabinets delivered were in exact accord with the contract. Plaintiff knew that actual installation might require adjustment for minute variations. However he chose to install them himself. He cannot now complain or seek to have a service performed for which he did not contract. Any finding based on a variance between the form of the contract when made and when offered in evidence was not based on proof sufficient to raise an issue.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs to appellant.

Concur—Hecht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.