Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961

110th Street Holding Corp. v. Herrera

110th Street Holding Corp. v. Herrera
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 9, 1961
32 Misc. 2d 663; 227 N.Y.S.2d 968; 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3415

Counsel

Leon Abolafia for appellant. Joseph B. Koppelman for respondent.

110th Street Holding Corp. v. Herrera

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The failure of the landlord to allege and prove compliance with subdivision 1 of section 52 and section 53 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations requiring landlord to plead and prove that landlord sent notice to the tenant with demand that violations be removed within 10-day limitation period was fatal to the right of landlord to maintain instant proceeding (Joyce Prop. v. Wilkenson, 122 N. Y. S. 2d 179).

The final order should he reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.