Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961

Seidman v. Melendez

Seidman v. Melendez
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 6, 1961
33 Misc. 2d 892; 230 N.Y.S.2d 44; 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1951

Counsel

Mary B. Tarcher and David L. Techlin for appellant. Hyman Frank for respondent.

Seidman v. Melendez

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The acceptance of rent by landlord from the occupant of the apartment, with knowledge that she was not the person who signed the lease, constituted a waiver of any right to forfeit the lease. (Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co., 272 N. Y. 304, 313.) Furthermore, by bringing a prior summary proceeding to evict the occupant for nonpayment of the August, 1960 rent, the landlord must be deemed to have accepted her as a tenant.

The final order should be unanimously reversed, with $30 costs to tenant, and final order directed for tenant, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — Hast, Di Gtovanna and Benjamin, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.