Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962

Kimmel v. Hughes

Kimmel v. Hughes
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 28, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 161; 232 N.Y.S.2d 200; 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3014

Counsel

Donald Crichton and Louis J. Shaw for appellant. Simon N. Hilliman for respondent.

Kimmel v. Hughes

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The Municipal Court was bound by the order of the Rent Commission which duly ordered and adjusted maximum rent of the tenant’s apartment by reason of a subtenancy therein of tenant’s cousin (David Holding Corp. v. Held, 105 N. Y. S. 2d 27; 83 Ridge St. Corp. v. Schnitzer, 199 Misc. 826; Pontello v. O’Shea, 200 Misc. 417). Moreover, section 55 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations specifies the persons who stand in the relationship of ‘ ‘ immediate family ’ ’. A cousin is not within the contemplation of this section.

The final order should be modified to the extent of granting landlord judgment for the additional sum of $21, and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — • Hoestadter, J. P., Hecht and Tilzer, JJ.

Pinal order modified, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.