Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962

Mace v. Cardone

Mace v. Cardone
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 5, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 163; 232 N.Y.S.2d 279; 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3566

Counsel

Bosenfeld & Silverman (Sidney B. Silverman of counsel), for appellant. Bennett I. Schlessel for respondent.

Mace v. Cardone

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The certificate of the notary public should have been received as presumptive evidence of the. facts contained in such certificate. This evidence would have established a prima facie case calling upon the defendant to offer testimony in contradiction thereof. The refusal of the court to receive the document bearing the certificate in evidence was error.

*164The judgment should he reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.