Mace v. Cardone
Mace v. Cardone
35 Misc. 2d 163; 232 N.Y.S.2d 279; 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3566
Opinion of the Court
The certificate of the notary public should have been received as presumptive evidence of the. facts contained in such certificate. This evidence would have established a prima facie case calling upon the defendant to offer testimony in contradiction thereof. The refusal of the court to receive the document bearing the certificate in evidence was error.
Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.