Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962

Silverman v. Newgold

Silverman v. Newgold
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 12, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 180; 232 N.Y.S.2d 133; 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3519

Counsel

Bassoff & Pollack (Isidore Bassoff of counsel), for appellant. Sohn S Okin (Louis Okin and Martin C. Sukenik of counsel), for respondents.

Silverman v. Newgold

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The removal of the tenant from the hotel apartment No. 419, which was controlled, to decontrolled apartment No. 722, was for the benefit and convenience of the landlord. The tenant continued to be a statutory tenant and entitled to the protection of the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd.). A statutory tenant may not be evicted by reason of the termination of the prime tenant’s lease. (McDonald v. Hector, 113 N. Y. S. 2d 64 [App. Term, 1st Dept.] ; Harwyn Dress Corp. v. International Dress Co., 147 N. Y. S. 2d 254; 610 West End Co. v. Cohen, 19 Misc 2d 130.)

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Pinal order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.