Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962

People v. Vollman

People v. Vollman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 29, 1962
38 Misc. 2d 1024; 237 N.Y.S.2d 786; 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2225

Counsel

Irwin D. Strauss for appellant. Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Arthur C. Muhlstock of counsel), for respondent.

People v. Vollman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record shows that the defendant was committed to an institution for the care of those mentally ill and the court below notified thereof in substantial compliance with section 873 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This constituted a final disposition of the offense, not a crime, with which he was charged, under the express provision of that section. It was, therefore, error to impose sentence, even though the sentence was suspended.

The judgment of conviction should be reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Hoestadter and Gold, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.