Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc.
Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc.
43 Misc. 2d 691; 251 N.Y.S.2d 974; 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1693
Opinion of the Court
While the trial court erred in holding that the termination provision of the lease was a “ condition ” rather than a “ conditional limitation ” (see, generally, Burnee Corp. v. Uneeda Pure Orange Drink Co., 132 Misc. 435; Ehret Holding
The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.
Concur — Gold, J. P., Tilzeb and Hofstadter, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.