Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964

Rosenbaum v. Williams

Rosenbaum v. Williams
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 23, 1964
44 Misc. 2d 236; 253 N.Y.S.2d 426; 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1431

Counsel

Richard E. Rahn and Walter F. Bucalos for appellants. Joseph L. Belvedere for respondent.

Rosenbaum v. Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The chattel mortgagor’s default gave the right

to possession and general title to the chattel mortgagee with the right of redemption remaining in said chattel mortgagor. The plaintiff’s purchase of the chattel mortgagor’s right in a Sheriff’s sale after levy and execution gives no possessory right or title but only the right of redemption. An action in conversion will not lie on behalf of one who has a mere right of redemption. (Hall v. Sampson, 35 N. Y. 274; Parish v. Wheeler, 22 N. Y. 494; Bragelman v. Daue, 69 N. Y. 69.)

The judgment should be unanimously reversed and the complaint dismissed, with $30 costs.

Concur — Hart, Brown and Groat, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.