Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965

Meguin v. Kramer

Meguin v. Kramer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 22, 1965
49 Misc. 2d 572; 268 N.Y.S.2d 191; 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1232

Counsel

Joseph S. Rodell and Michael L. Matar for appellant. Teller-man <& Silverstein (Walter C. Silverstein of counsel), for respondents.

Meguin v. Kramer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs, who were not licensed to do plumbing work in New York City, may not recover a balance alleged to be due even if such work were subcontracted by plaintiffs to a licensed plumber (Wexler v. Rust, 144 App. Div. 296; Weinstein v. Silberfeld, 116 N. Y. S. 2d 471; see, also, Bronold v. Engler, 194 N. Y. 323). However, plaintiffs are not precluded from seeking to recover any unpaid balance claimed to be due for work other than plumbing and materials furnished in connection therewith (Johnston v. Dahlgren, 166 N. Y. 354; Weinstein v. Silberfeld, supra; 18 N. Y. Jur., Electricians, Plumbers, Artisans, ยง 25).

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to defendant to abide the event.

Concur โ€” Brows", Schwaetewald and Baker, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.