Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966

Blumenstock v. Weissman

Blumenstock v. Weissman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 30, 1966
50 Misc. 2d 119; 269 N.Y.S.2d 507; 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2033

Counsel

Hyman Blumenstock, appellant in person, and for Florence Blumenstock and others, appellants. Allen M. Taylor and Martin M. Baxter for respondents.

Blumenstock v. Weissman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In our opinion the holding of the County Court that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion to vacate its prior determination would be equally applicable to the Justice’s Court had an application for similar relief been directed to that court in the first instance. (See Duran v. Chelsea Exch. Bank, 123 Misc. 158.)

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Margett, Brenner and Ollifpe, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.