Blumenstock v. Weissman
Blumenstock v. Weissman
50 Misc. 2d 119; 269 N.Y.S.2d 507; 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2033
Opinion of the Court
In our opinion the holding of the County Court that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion to vacate its prior determination would be equally applicable to the Justice’s Court had an application for similar relief been directed to that court in the first instance. (See Duran v. Chelsea Exch. Bank, 123 Misc. 158.)
The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.
Margett, Brenner and Ollifpe, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.